Where can I find Mastodon Android applications?
Mastodon was the result of my recent search for an alternative to Twitter (though I assume I'm not the only one). I prefer it there since most of the inhabitants are intelligent, nice, and less inclined to explode than on Twitter. After becoming accustomed to the UI, though, I recognized that, despite being usable, the mobile app left something to be desired. I was therefore excited to try the beta version of Ivory when I learned that, according to multiple accounts, it delivered a significantly better experience.
Then I encountered a common issue: Ivory is exclusive to iOS devices. I use Android.
I've been using Android phones for quite some time now. I enjoy Android and am comfortable with it, but I am not a fanatic. I have nothing at all against iOS and iPhones; I have one on my desk that I use for work purposes. There are aspects of iOS that I prefer, as well as aspects of Android that I prefer.
On the other hand, I must admit that I sometimes feel like a five-year-old when I hear about an app that appears extremely simple and useful, rush to its website to see if I can try it, and discover that it's only available for iOS. I greatly despise anyone who tells me I cannot play with this new toy.
I am not alone in this. Recently, there have been a number of engaging discussions on Mastodon around this topic. Quite a few Mastodon novices, particularly those accustomed to the Twitter UI and Twitter's third-party applications, are currently searching for apps to enhance the experience. Not surprisingly, iOS is developing superior applications to Android.
Why? Well, there are numerous options, many of which have been addressed in other Mastodon threads.
These applications were developed by iOS programmers using Twitter.
Now that Elon Musk has banned third-party applications from Twitter, Twitter application developers are going to Mastodon. For instance, Tapbots, a two-person development company that created Tweetbot and a few other apps for iOS and macOS, is presently working on Ivory, which is being billed as the next big thing for Mastodon clients. Clearly, Android is not on their radar.
Android app development is more difficult.
Apple sells only a handful of phone models per year, and each is designed to fit its most recent operating system. Android, on the other hand, is featured on phones made by a variety of manufacturers for a variety of phones, and the operating system is frequently heavily modified. For instance, Samsung, which is responsible for a significant number of Android phones on the market, offers a version of Android with a user interface and fundamental functionality that can be quite distinct from those of Google's version (which can be found on phones like the Pixel line).
Dealing with these discrepancies requires resources, which individual developers and smaller businesses may lack. JR Raphael, creator and publisher of Android Intelligence, states, "These days, it's uncommon for a large company to fail to release an app for both Android and iOS simultaneously and with similar priority. With smaller, startup-based businesses and more independent app developers, I believe we observe a notable distinction. In such situations, where resources are clearly limited and a company must decide where its attention is most useful, we still find places focusing initially on iOS and then returning to Android in the future, or focusing solely on iOS. It is a frustrating fact that I wish we could alter."
Apple customers are more willing to spend money on their products.
There appears to be a preconception that Apple ecosystem users are either wealthier or more ready to spend more on their technology. Undoubtedly, Apple is renowned for its expensive gear. And while the best Android phones, such as those supplied by Samsung or the most recent Pixels, aren't exactly budget smartphones, there are a large number of less expensive Android phones available.
Here are a few statistics: According to Statista.com, Apple's App Store generated approximately $21.2 billion in revenue during the third quarter of 2022, compared to the Play Store's $10.4 billion. Apple announced 2 billion active users in its financial report for the first quarter of 2023, which is 1 billion fewer than the 3 billion active devices that Google reported in 2021. So, unless Google lost over a billion users in the past year — which would have certainly made headlines – the App Store generates significantly more revenue despite being utilized by significantly fewer people. Despite the fact that a significant portion of this revenue is allocated to games, iOS developers still receive a greater slice of the pie than Android developers.
Thus, this notion is supported by several data. And because of this, in addition to the other challenges, a smaller business or even an individual developer may find it financially advantageous (regardless of their personal preferences) to design programs for iOS devices.
Apple's interface is more aesthetically pleasing.
This is the one I found most intriguing: the claim that Apple's apps are simply more artistically and user-experience-wise appealing. It's one of the most common arguments I hear from Apple fans: the interfaces of macOS and iOS applications are significantly more aesthetically beautiful and user-friendly than those created for Android's operating system. https://ejtandemonium.com/
John Gruber, author of the Daring Fireball blog and host of The Talk With John Gruber, has authored several well-written pieces on this topic. The submission "Making Our Hearts Sing," whose title is a phrase from Steve Jobs' final stage appearance, particularly captivated me. Gruber states, "I believe that over the past decade or so, rather than the two platforms achieving a state of equilibrium, the cultural disparities have deepened as both users and developers have self-sorted. Others who recognize and appreciate the creative worth of software and interface design have overwhelmingly gravitated toward iOS, while those who do not have chosen Android. http://sentrateknikaprima.com/
Mastodon was the result of my recent search for an alternative to Twitter (though I assume I'm not the only one). I prefer it there since most of the inhabitants are intelligent, nice, and less inclined to explode than on Twitter. After becoming accustomed to the UI, though, I recognized that, despite being usable, the mobile app left something to be desired. I was therefore excited to try the beta version of Ivory when I learned that, according to multiple accounts, it delivered a significantly better experience.
Then I encountered a common issue: Ivory is exclusive to iOS devices. I use Android.
I've been using Android phones for quite some time now. I enjoy Android and am comfortable with it, but I am not a fanatic. I have nothing at all against iOS and iPhones; I have one on my desk that I use for work purposes. There are aspects of iOS that I prefer, as well as aspects of Android that I prefer.
On the other hand, I must admit that I sometimes feel like a five-year-old when I hear about an app that appears extremely simple and useful, rush to its website to see if I can try it, and discover that it's only available for iOS. I greatly despise anyone who tells me I cannot play with this new toy.
I am not alone in this. Recently, there have been a number of engaging discussions on Mastodon around this topic. Quite a few Mastodon novices, particularly those accustomed to the Twitter UI and Twitter's third-party applications, are currently searching for apps to enhance the experience. Not surprisingly, iOS is developing superior applications to Android.
Why? Well, there are numerous options, many of which have been addressed in other Mastodon threads.
These applications were developed by iOS programmers using Twitter.
Now that Elon Musk has banned third-party applications from Twitter, Twitter application developers are going to Mastodon. For instance, Tapbots, a two-person development company that created Tweetbot and a few other apps for iOS and macOS, is presently working on Ivory, which is being billed as the next big thing for Mastodon clients. Clearly, Android is not on their radar.
Android app development is more difficult.
Apple sells only a handful of phone models per year, and each is designed to fit its most recent operating system. Android, on the other hand, is featured on phones made by a variety of manufacturers for a variety of phones, and the operating system is frequently heavily modified. For instance, Samsung, which is responsible for a significant number of Android phones on the market, offers a version of Android with a user interface and fundamental functionality that can be quite distinct from those of Google's version (which can be found on phones like the Pixel line).
Dealing with these discrepancies requires resources, which individual developers and smaller businesses may lack. JR Raphael, creator and publisher of Android Intelligence, states, "These days, it's uncommon for a large company to fail to release an app for both Android and iOS simultaneously and with similar priority. With smaller, startup-based businesses and more independent app developers, I believe we observe a notable distinction. In such situations, where resources are clearly limited and a company must decide where its attention is most useful, we still find places focusing initially on iOS and then returning to Android in the future, or focusing solely on iOS. It is a frustrating fact that I wish we could alter."
Apple customers are more willing to spend money on their products.
There appears to be a preconception that Apple ecosystem users are either wealthier or more ready to spend more on their technology. Undoubtedly, Apple is renowned for its expensive gear. And while the best Android phones, such as those supplied by Samsung or the most recent Pixels, aren't exactly budget smartphones, there are a large number of less expensive Android phones available.
Here are a few statistics: According to Statista.com, Apple's App Store generated approximately $21.2 billion in revenue during the third quarter of 2022, compared to the Play Store's $10.4 billion. Apple announced 2 billion active users in its financial report for the first quarter of 2023, which is 1 billion fewer than the 3 billion active devices that Google reported in 2021. So, unless Google lost over a billion users in the past year — which would have certainly made headlines – the App Store generates significantly more revenue despite being utilized by significantly fewer people. Despite the fact that a significant portion of this revenue is allocated to games, iOS developers still receive a greater slice of the pie than Android developers.
Thus, this notion is supported by several data. And because of this, in addition to the other challenges, a smaller business or even an individual developer may find it financially advantageous (regardless of their personal preferences) to design programs for iOS devices.
Apple's interface is more aesthetically pleasing.
This is the one I found most intriguing: the claim that Apple's apps are simply more artistically and user-experience-wise appealing. It's one of the most common arguments I hear from Apple fans: the interfaces of macOS and iOS applications are significantly more aesthetically beautiful and user-friendly than those created for Android's operating system. https://ejtandemonium.com/
John Gruber, author of the Daring Fireball blog and host of The Talk With John Gruber, has authored several well-written pieces on this topic. The submission "Making Our Hearts Sing," whose title is a phrase from Steve Jobs' final stage appearance, particularly captivated me. Gruber states, "I believe that over the past decade or so, rather than the two platforms achieving a state of equilibrium, the cultural disparities have deepened as both users and developers have self-sorted. Others who recognize and appreciate the creative worth of software and interface design have overwhelmingly gravitated toward iOS, while those who do not have chosen Android. http://sentrateknikaprima.com/
